Randy Barnett over at the Volokh Conspiracy has a post.
"I am old enough to remember way back in 2002, when the legal professoriate was busy criticizing the Rehnquist Court for its conservative judicial activism for its decisions in such cases as United States v. Lopez and United States v. Morrison. Now, of course, we are told by the defenders of the constitutionality of the ACA that these cases are hallowed precedents that provide the only limits on the commerce power of Congress, lest they have to defend the untenable position that there are no limits whatsoever."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please moderate yourself and your language. No posting of links to businesses, if you have a business you wish to advertise send me an e-mail. Please do not hide links in a comment. Post any links in full.
If you do not have a full user profile, your comment may be reported as spam. Particularly if you post a link to a commercial site.
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語
It doesn't take much to fill your profile and put in a picture.
Thank you for reading my blog.