Monday, January 7, 2013

The law of Uninteded Consequences

"In a move likely to cause an uproar across Portland-area coffeehouses, Oregon's state legislature is again considering instituting a per-mile tax on super-fuel-efficient cars and electric vehicles. The state is looking to recuperate revenue lost because more fuel efficient vehicles on the road result in fewer dollars being collected from gas taxes."

So the .GOV requires more fuel efficiency, but how do they recoup the Fuel Taxes they lose from more fuel efficient vehicles?  

Do you see where this is going?

A logical conclusion would be further on down the road GPS Trackers will be required to be installed in ALL vehicles, to track not just the mileage but on which roads you drive on.  So certain roads can be designated for a "Higher" tax or toll.

Do you really want the .GOV knowing where you go?  Or having the ability to charge you for miles you might drive off road?  If I go to my cousins farm, I spend several miles on back roads which aren't owned by the state, my cousin owns them, they are his driveway.  Am I going to be charged for the miles incurred on my cousin's private road?  Or any private road?

See there too many things wrong with the law of unintended consequences.

And legislators keep trying to intrude, to get their $$ and to innvade yours and my privacy.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please moderate yourself and your language. No posting of links to businesses, if you have a business you wish to advertise send me an e-mail. Please do not hide links in a comment. Post any links in full.

If you do not have a full user profile, your comment may be reported as spam. Particularly if you post a link to a commercial site.

中國詞不評論,冒抹除的風險。僅英語

It doesn't take much to fill your profile and put in a picture.

Thank you for reading my blog.