Over at Peter's we find the following.
"Referees at the most prestigious of journals have given the green light to research that was later found to be wholly fraudulent. Conversely, they’ve scoffed at work that went on to win Nobel prizes. Richard Smith, a former editor of the British Medical Journal, describes peer review as a roulette wheel, a lottery and a black box. He points out that an extensive body of research finds scant evidence that this vetting process accomplishes much at all. On the other hand, a mountain of scholarship has identified profound deficiencies."
Remember the DDT Study?
DDT: A Case Study in Scientific Fraud (.PDF)
How many people have DIED because of the increase of Malaria and other diseases because DDT has been banned?
And don't even get me started on "The Science is Settled - Climate Change - Global Warming - Global Cooling" they cannot even make up their mind if we are supposed to die from runaway greenhouse effects or die from runaway ice ages.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please moderate yourself and your language. No posting of links to businesses, if you have a business you wish to advertise send me an e-mail. Please do not hide links in a comment. Post any links in full.
If you do not have a full user profile, your comment may be reported as spam. Particularly if you post a link to a commercial site.
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語
It doesn't take much to fill your profile and put in a picture.
Thank you for reading my blog.