The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. v. James, leaving New York’s gun-industry public nuisance law standing for now and giving anti-gun states a dangerous opening to continue their lawfare campaign against lawful gun makers, distributors, and dealers.
The Court’s June 15 order in docket No. 25-1026 says only two words that matter here: “Petition DENIED.”
That is not a ruling on the merits or an endorsement of New York Attorney General Letitia James’s attack on the firearms industry. It is not a declaration that Congress’s Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act is meaningless. But in practical terms, it leaves the Second Circuit’s bad decision in place and allows New York’s anti-PLCAA workaround to survive another day. That should concern every gun owner in America.
New York’s law was signed in 2021 by then-Governor Andrew Cuomo and was designed to expose firearm industry members to civil lawsuits under a so-called public nuisance theory. The law targets gun makers, wholesalers, distributors, and dealers for allegedly endangering public safety through the sale or marketing of firearms and ammunition.
Click the link to read the whole article: Supreme Court Lets New York’s Anti-Gun Lawfare Continue
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please moderate yourself and your language. No posting of links to businesses, if you have a business you wish to advertise send me an e-mail. Please do not hide links in a comment. Post any links in full.
If you do not have a full user profile, your comment may be reported as spam. Particularly if you post a link to a commercial site.
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語
It doesn't take much to fill your profile and put in a picture.
Thank you for reading my blog.