O Rly?

Hillary Clinton: Al-Qaeda in Africa Has No Interest to Attack Our Homeland (Video)

When they couldn't even get the reasoning behind the attack against our Legation in Benghazi correct.  Calling it an act of reprisal due to a Youtube clip about Mohammed, they expect us to believe they actually know what they are talking about when it comes to our Nations Security.

My honest opinion?

Going by all of the .GOV's denials, we are probably going to have a major terrorist attack against the mainland of our Nation.

Due to the STUPIDITY of the current resident of 1600, and his Minions and Controllers.

The Republicans need to man up

"The Democrats spent more of their time lauding Clinton, thanking her for her service and praising her for one thing or another, than they spent asking any questions. Sen. Dick Durbin swung into a dissertation on Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction, failing to note that the woman sitting before him at the hearing also believed in WMDs and advocated war against Saddam Hussein on that basis. Some of the Republicans, particularly Sens. Ron Johnson, John McCain, and Rand Paul, asked probing questions. You can see some of those in other posts."

I'm sorry but with the exception of Rand Paul and Ron Johnson, none of them had the testicular fortitude to ask Hillary Clinton the hard questions.  It appeared as if the Dem's had some form of leverage over the Republicans in the Senate to keep them from hammering her to find out WHY was there no military back up sent when we had assets in the sky broadcasting the live video back to the Whitehouse, the Pentagon and who knows where else?

Why?  When there were Combat Assets less than 2 hours away that could have totally decimated the attack if they had only been given the word?  Why were those assets NOT set into motion?  Why were REPEATED requests for assistance either denied or ignored?  Why was our Ambassador allowed to be murdered?

Man Up Republicans.

Or you may not like what happens to you next election cycle.

Over at Texas Fred

There are a few postings you should read.

"I wonder if THIS post will Offend the Muslims?"


"Rice contradicts Libyan account, says attack was not premeditated"

"This is Islam, the so-called *Religion of Peace*"

"Sec. Clinton keeps to 2011 UN pledge to ‘shame’ and ‘pressure’ Americans who denigrate Islam" 

Be sure to check all the links.  Very Interesting and enlightening

If I failed consistently to do

my job, constantly failed to do what was required of me.  I would be fired for non performance.  That is true in the corporate world, true in private industry, true in the military.  If you can't do your job, you are replaced with someone who WILL do the job.  So why is it that the Administrative Branch of the Government thinks it can keep failing, and not get replaced?

"The White House on Friday said it will miss the legal deadline for delivering a report to Congress on the spending cuts from sequestration that are scheduled to take effect in 2013.

Spokesman Jay Carney told reporters on Air Force One that the report will be coming next week.

Under the terms of the Sequestration Transparency Act signed in August, President Obama was to tell Congress by Friday how the administration plans to implement the $109 billion in automatic cuts mandated by the Budget Control Act.

The Office of Management and Budget has repeatedly failed to make legal deadlines. It delivered its presidential budget proposals and mid-session updates late both this year and last year. 
Republicans have tried to tie the tardiness to the failure of the Senate to pass a budget resolution for the last three years."

Is the Administrative Branch under the impression that the Laws that everyone else in this country have to abide by, don't apply to them?

Just one more proof that the current administration is a complete and utter failure.

H/t Insty

Over at Ace's on tonight overnight open thread

the very top entry.  there are some links you need to check out.  I'll excerpt it here without the links, so you will need to click on over to check the links.

"Much as been made recently of Obama being better on National Security than Romney, mostly having to do with the killing of Bin Laden occurring while he was golfing currently occupying the position of President. But isn't the number one threat to our National Security our growing, out of control debt? Back in 2010, the Chairman, Joint Chiefs Of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen Thought So. So how does the President handle our number one National Security threat? Why, He Blows Off A Mandated Deadline To Detail The Defense Spending Cuts that are required for sequestration. And why exactly are we left with sequestration? Because the President's own party has failed to pass a budget in over 3 years and Obama essentially killed The Debt Deal With Boehner. The President's National Security policies seem to be Taking The Easier Path To A Worse Place. 

The most important national security problem facing our nation -- the crushing load of debt that will crowd out discretionary spending by our government -- was addressed in the context of cutting military spending. The president who has doubled our national debt in three years now claims "I will use the money we're no longer spending on war to pay down our debt and put more people back to work rebuilding roads and bridges and schools and runways, because after two wars that have cost us thousands of lives and over a trillion dollars, it's time to do some nation building right here at home." That is, defense is the bill payer for his domestic programs. He claimed "I'm still eager to reach an agreement based on the principles of my bipartisan debt commission," but he has taken no action at all to bring the Simpson-Bowles Commission's recommendations into effect -- they weren't in his budget, they weren't in his proposals during the debt limit negotiations last summer."