Gobal Warming/Climate Change/AGW

I found this while perusing a few other places and thought it very interesting.


"The problem with modern science is that it is so compartmentalized.

"Scientists" rarely become highly educated in more than one field, because, well, to be blunt... most scientists aren't thooper geniousez. The average scientist is... average, and human knowledge is to vast.

What is needed is a summary free of socialistic politics/religion of global warming.

The problem with "global warming" or "global cooling" is that so many scientists try to understand it based on incomplete information. Some things that are almost never mentioned in the papers are things like...(forgive me as I wax scientific) All data given here can be verified.

1. Oceanography: oceans are a massive carbon source/sink which absorb or emit CO2 into the atmosphere over long time scale: as needed (time scales of centuries). CO2 ends up turning into rock if there is a vast excess of carbon dioxide in the ocean, that rock eventually comes back up in volcanoes (see #2). (one such common rock layer is called calcium carbonate, AKA limestone) a zoom in of "al gore's" infamous charts prove that atmospheric carbon dioxide levels FOLLOW global temps... in oceanography this is well known. If you want proof, open a Cold Beer then open Hot Beer (preferably outside, you can thank me later).

2. Geology: Plate tectonics- volcanoes et. al. put out orders of magnitude more pollution than the whole of humanity.

3. Physics: Thermodynamics: The sun, you know, that big ball of fire in the sky? It make stuff hot. More on this later, cause it's a bit more complicated than all that.

4: Astrophysics: Cosmic rays cause cloud formation.Situation= sun is in a "hot cycle".

The solar wind forms a "bubble" in space, protecting the earth from cosmic rays. When the sun is "hot" then the solar wind blows harder. When the solar wind blows harder, then fewer cosmic rays can reach earth. Less cosmic rays= less clouds. Less clouds = more sunlight reaching earth's surface. More sunlight reaching earth's surface = HOTTER.

When the sun is "cool" the solar wind is weaker, so more cosmic rays get through the "space bubble". Cosmic rays hitting the atmosphere cause more clouds, which reflect sunlight back into space before it reaches the earth's surface... thus cooling the earth.

5. Biology: my personal favorite. Plant growth is determined by a great many things. However with most of these things (minerals/water/sunlight) you can only give a plant a certain maximum amount to increase growth. You give more than that, you kill the plant or the plant just doesn't get any bigger or grow any faster, no matter how much more you give to the plant. There is one nutrient however that will make a plant grow bigger and bigger, faster and faster... Carbon Dioxide.

That's right folks, want to feed the world? No More Starving children? More CO2 in the atmosphere is a good thing. 

This is in a discussion about John Ringo's book, "The Last Centurion".  If you haven't read the book, I highly suggest that you do.

Do as I say, Not as I do.

"As the Weasel Zippers blog notes today, “UNREAL: NY Times Suggests Killing ‘Climate Change Deniers’… Note the woman in the top right box using an icicle to stab a ‘denier’ in the chest.” I’m embedding the entire page with the New York Times’ logo on it, to make it obvious that the cartoon is appearing on their Website. Click on image above to expand. As the Zippers suggest, take a good look at the right-hand panel. Global warming has made much of the country so cold that the Times is instructing its readers to use giant icicles to bludgeon the non-believers to death."

The left has this credibility issue.  Such as if we don't agree with their unfounded premise of Global Warming/Climate Change/Anthropogenic Global Warming, we must be killed.

If we think there are too many gun laws already, we must be rounded up in camps and destroyed.

If we disagree with the Obama Administration in any way, we are "Racist" and must be killed.

Basically anyone who disagrees with what they believe in in basically a Apostate, Heretic, or evil and we must be removed from their dream planet before we can scare the little children.



I'm sorry.  But this is my planet too.  And just like them I have Rights.  The same Rights as them.

And yet here they are trying to restrict or destroy my Rights.  Because they don't think I should have them.

Many Gun Control Advocates have a psychological condition.

They will never admit that, however if they were psychoanalyzed, I'm quite sure the examining psychiatrist would diagnose them as suffering from "Transference".

That is where a person redirects their own feelings on to others. And we have had many examples of Gun Control Advocates and many run of the mill anti-gun politicians, actors, actresses, business leaders etcetera ad nauseum, who have wished violence onto others who do not agree with them.  Hmmm, so they are attributing their own feeling of violence to others.

No WONDER they are against people exercising their Constitutional Rights.  Because they can barely control their own violent impulses, they naturally assume that everyone else is the same way.

If you don't agree with their opinion about Global Warming, oh I'm sorry anthropogenic global warming, then you are a denier and must be removed from the planet so as not to taint others with your heresy.

You disagree with Same Sex Marriage?  You are disgusting and should be put down like a rabid animal.

You are against "Reasonable Gun Control"  You are a serial killer just biding your time until you snap and start killing people and must be disarmed or incarcerated.

These people have a deep psychological problem.  They transfer their own beliefs and feeling onto others.  They of course are as pure as the driven snow, and you must not question their motives.  If you do, it just shows that you are subversive and must be punished.

So keep this thought in the back of your mind if you ever run into one of those virulent gun control advocates, Climate Change, AGW, or any other polarizing issue.  They are mentally ill.

And since they are mentally ill, they will assume YOU are mentally ill, and are wrong.  Even if you have facts, Data, and everything else to back up your claims.

You are wrong, becasue you are mentally ill just like them.