Scandal? What Scandal?

Hillary Clinton Tries to Quell Controversy Over Private Email

AP sues State Department, seeking access to Clinton records

I posted about these e-mails the other day. This whole issue is because Hillary Clinton doesn't want ANYONE looking over her shoulder, and she doesn't want ANYTHING which could come back on her and ruin her bid for 2016. Hence her private server and hence her evasions and distortions.

The AP can sue all they want, but they won't get anything that Hillary Clinton doesn't want them to have.

And that is one of the points.

AP sues to get access and then down the road, "Oops" they get some "E-mail" turned over to them.  None of it will contain ANYTHING that will be seriously damaging to Hillary.

Then she can point out, "Oh look, AP sued and I turned over the e-mails and they didn't find anything, so this is a non-issue.", when she gets asked about it on the Campaign trail or if any challengers bring them up.

Basically she is getting her scandals out into the public and disposed of early, so they cannot be brought up later against her.

No getting whammied

by any scandal or issue that SHE and her handlers don't control.

All this talk about Elizabeth (Fauxahontas) Warren being drafted to replace Hillary, is part of the game plan.  It forces any GOP or other challenger to split their attention, and force them to spend money trying to combat BOTH Hillary and Faux.  With the GOP financing brigade firming up behind Jeb (ptooi) Bush-League, the possibility of having TWO DNC Contenders both female with strong support bases, will scare off many people from donating.  They would probably see it as a waste of money to give to ANY GOP Candidate, as they would figure that either Shrillary or Faux Warren will get the Nomination, and ALL of the DNC's stooges will line up behind either or.

So this ISN'T a scandal for Shrillary.  This is her clearing the gun ports against any possible lever that the GOP or other serious challenger might bring.

So don't expect this AP Lawsuit to bear any real fruit.

This is ALL "Smoke and Mirrors".

Although, I do have to wonder if O'BUMa will set his OFA Machine, behind either of them due to his narcissism and need for self aggrandizement.

He might decide on a THIRD Candidate, probably Black and Definitely a Woman, to be the Candidate he will support, and his own disciples will as well.

Probably someone who can undercut Shrillary's own qualifications of being Bill's partner, and has already dipped her finger into the pond through meaningless but EXPENSIVE programs.  Who has been spending Tax-Payer money to "Visit" with other world leaders right under our noses.

Think about that.

If you have done nothing wrong why worry?

"Unsurprisingly, the usual Big Brother apologists chimed in with the rebuttal, “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about.”"

Because under the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, I have an "Expectation of Privacy".  Which mean I can feel secure in my home, on my computer, on my cell phone from intrusion by ANYONE.  It doesn't matter if I haven't committed a crime or an offense.  I have an Expectation of Privacy.  Therefore the .GOV has no legal Right to examine, surveil, record or in any way shape or form, monitor me or my communications.

Until such time as they gather evidence of any wrong doing by me, they cannot monitor my communications, surveil me or intrude on my privacy.  For them to do that they are REQUIRED to present their evidence of my alleged wrong doing to a judge, who then makes the determination as to whether they have enough evidence to reach the threshold of "Probable Cause"

They are FOBIDDEN by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights from "Dragnet" surveillance, which is just like it sounds.  Throwing out a net and gathering in as much information as they can from as many people as they can in order to look for any wrong doing.

Did you catch that?

They don't have a suspicion of wrong doing by any one particular person, but they are gathering data on people to LOOK for any evidence of wrong doing.

That is Unconstitutional.

In other words, it is ILLEGAL.

I have the RIGHT to be secure in my home, head and communications, be they verbal, written or electronic.  WITHOUT the .GOV seeking to obtain it without "Due Process".

So it doesn't matter if I have nothing to hide.  It matters that the .GOV violated my Rights, your Rights, and BROKE THE LAW.

That is what is at issue in these scandals.

The .GOV, it's agencies and agents VIOLATED the Laws and the Constitution of this nation.

For that there needs to be consequences, for ANY AND ALL involved in those violations.  From those at the bottom who performed the violations, to those at the top who either ordered them or through inaction allowed them to occur.

This is a Nation of Rights and Laws.

If the .GOV can trample on the Rights and Laws with Impunity, what type of Nation are we?

Media gets caught trying to influence the narrative AGAIN

First you had the "Heckling" of the father of a Sandy Hook victim which didn't take place now AP has been caught with their hands in the cookie jar.

"Here’s the current Associated Press report:

Dykes was known in the neighborhood as a menacing figure who neighbors said once beat a dog to death with a lead pipe, threatened to shoot children for setting foot on his property and patrolled his yard at night with a flashlight and an assault rifle. 

Here’s the earlier story:

Dykes was known around the neighborhood as a menacing figure who once beat a dog to death with a lead pipe, threatened to shoot children for setting foot on his property and patrolled his yard at night with a flashlight and a shotgun."


Remember, the media LIES to you.  The media has NO obligation to tell the truth.  The media has THEIR own agenda and it's not your, mine or ours.