If the facts and the law are against you, attack the character of the witness.

Peter points out an old adage that is truer today more than ever.


I direct you to Peter's to RTWT

Media Narrative FAIL!!!

I haven't said much about the Mass Murder event in Orlando because it sickens me and we don't have all of the FACTS as of yet.

However, that doesn't stop the Lame Stream Media from pushing their INCORRECT Narrative and Agenda.

From Bob Owens at Bearing Arms:


"The anti-gun politimedia wasted no time at all demonizing the most common rifle in the United States as being the real villain of the Islamic terrorist attack on Pulse nightclub in Orlando.

Newsweek screamed, “ORLANDO SHOOTING PUTS SPOTLIGHT ON AR-15 RIFLE.”

Judd Legume of Think Progress squeaked, “The NRA’s Love Affair With The AR-15, Weapon Of Choice For Mass Murderers, In 22 Tweets.”

Always wrong Christopher Ingraham of the Washington Post whined, “The gun used in the Orlando shooting is becoming mass shooters’ weapon of choice.”

Here’s the thing.

The rifle used by the Islamist terrorist in Orlando was not an AR-15."

Click on the above link to RTWT.

Here is the thing though.  The media and the Anti-gunner DON'T CARE.

They don't care if what they saying is wrong.  They are going to keep screaming and yelling to drown out anyone who even TRIES to get the truth out there.

They will conveniently IGNORE the fact that the FBI screwed up.  they will IGNORE the fact that this murderer's own co workers reported him and were brushed off as being "Racist".  they don't CARE that he was evidently either a Gay or Bi-sexual Muslim.  It was the GUN and the NRA's fault, the FBI didn't do due diligence in their investigation.  It was the Gun and the NRA's fault this guy was able to pass a NICS check not once but TWICE.  It's the GUN and the NRA's fault, that this murderer had a clearance obtained through a background check performed by the FBI.  It is the GUN and the NRA's fault that the murderer had over 30 MINUTES to kill people before the police even responded. 

You see the TRUTH is the first victim.

H/t Kenny aka Wirecutter

Slavery - Civil War Nathan Bedford Forrest - From Book of Face

About Memphis exhuming General Nathan Bedford Forest and his wife.

Memphis City Council Votes to Dig Up Grave of Confederate General, Sell His Statue

There was the following answer:

Ok, people wash off that "White Privilege" guilt it is History time and it is here to save the day. Ok What was the war about? Lincoln's popularity Period. On November 6, 1860, Lincoln won the presidential election without the support of a single Southern state. Talk of secession, bandied about since the 1830s, took on a serious new tone. The Civil War was not entirely caused by Lincoln’s election, but the election was one of the primary reasons the war broke out the following year. OK now who owned more blacks? The Blacks did!!!!!! The fact is large numbers of free Negroes owned black slaves; in fact, in numbers disproportionate to their representation in society at large. In 1860 only a small minority of whites owned slaves. According to the U.S. census report for that last year before the Civil War, there were nearly 27 million whites in the country. Some eight million of them lived in the slaveholding states.

The census also determined that there were fewer than 385,000 individuals who owned slaves (1). Even if all slaveholders had been white, that would amount to only 1.4 percent of whites in the country (or 4.8 percent of southern whites owning one or more slaves) Ok now if only six percent in the south owned slave what was the reast fighting for? Representation... U.S. Grant also had several slaves, who were only freed after the 13th amendment in December of 1865. When asked why he didn’t free his slaves earlier, Grant stated “Good help is so hard to come by these days.”

Contrarily, Confederate General Robert E. Lee freed his slaves (which he never purchased — they were inherited) in 1862! Lee freed his slaves several years before the war was over, and considerably earlier than his Northern counterparts. And during the fierce early days of the war when the South was obliterating the Yankee armies!

Lastly, and most importantly, why did NORTHERN States outlaw slavery only AFTER the war was over? The so-called “Emancipation Proclamation” of Lincoln only gave freedom to slaves in the SOUTH! NOT in the North! This pecksniffery even went so far as to find the state of Delaware rejecting the 13th Amendment in December of 1865 and did not ratify it (13th Amendment / free the slaves) until 1901!

AND the following two links:

DIXIE'S CENSORED SUBJECT BLACK SLAVEOWNERS

Abraham Lincoln President February 12, 1809 – April 15, 1865

All this is, is a desire to DESTROY real history, so someone can write their own narrative.  And then force that narrative to be taught in all of the schools.

The TRUTH doesn't matter.  Only the Narrative.

So when you see or hear people caling for the take down of a lfag or the destruction of a grave or a memorial, ask yourself this.  "Who really doesn't know the history?  And who has an Agenda?"

Four over at Blue's

First Pravda again has something that needs to be read.

"In the Western world truth no longer has any meaning. In its place stands agenda.

Agenda is all important, because it is the way Washington achieves hegemony over the world and the American people. 9/11 was the "new Pearl Harbor" that the neoconservatives declared to be necessary for their planned wars against Muslim countries. For the neoconservatives to go forward with their agenda, it was necessary for Americans to be connected to the agenda."

Second 

Can't Happen Here    When the proof is, it already has once and might be again.

Third

Debating Liberals  

Fourth

The Oath.. 

Click the above, and illuminate yourself.

From Blue

His post is HERE:

For those who don't believe anything

not even the truth. Written by a great author, Lois McMaster Bujold.

"If no guarantee can suit you, perhaps the flaw is not in the guarantee, but in you"

For the Climate Change believers, the Liberal Left Wing Fanatics and others. If you refuse to believe anything those who differ from you says, maybe the problem isn't with them. But with you.

If you wish to know which novel the quote is from it is "Brothers in Arms" and I strongly recommend the whole series of novels.

Media bias illustrated

They show you only what they want you to see, so they can direct the narrative.  They don't show you what the truth actually is, so you can decide for yourself.