Ok, I wan't going to post on this but a certain comment means I HAVE TO.
"…The use of sexbots in the privacy of one’s home is prohibited, unless otherwise permitted by the Ministry of Robots and Artificial intelligence or a relevant regulating agency as per the criteria outlined in the Human-Robot Personal Relationship Act."
There is the link to the story, however the comment below is why I HAD to write this up. As it explains to me why Feminists/Feminazi's are so vehement.
"mr. wavevector said...
"may unduly emphasize the objectification of women as sexual objects"
May replace women with sexual objects is more like it.
The driving force for this sexbot prohibition is one element of the feminine imperative - female resource appropriation. Female resource appropriation occurs when females claim or take male generated resources for their own use, often through the use of some moral artifice to coerce male compliance. "Gender equality" is the primary moral artifice used today to appropriate male resources. Men generate more resources than women; women use "gender equality" to force the redistribution of resources from men to women.
What does sexbot prohibition have to do with female resource appropriation? Even feminists understand at some level that there has to be some appearance of an exchange in their appropriation - that male resistance is inevitable if women give absolutely nothing in exchange for the resources they take. If the value of sex is undermined by sexbots, they will have nothing to give, and their system of appropriating male resources in the name of "equality" will break down."
I have given up trying to have a rational discussion with some of the more, shall I say "Over the top" Feminists. Nothing I try to say, no argument or evidence I put forth is "good enough" Because "I" am a "man" and I don't "know" what it is like to be or live as a woman.
Quoting from Bujold AGAIN ( A GREAT Author by the way and she's a woman to boot) "If no guarantee will suit you, maybe the problem is not in the guarantee, but in you."
ETA: You HAVE to also read the article I link below. Here is a teaser:
"Several feminist groups have maintained that “Control over reproduction is a basic need and a basic right for all women.” That is, the control of who gets to reproduce, according to feminism, belongs exclusively in the hands of one gender, despite all the braying about “equality”. But what happens when that just won’t be the case? What happens in our society when a majority of working women can’t find husbands – or even dates, thanks to the Sexbot craze – and end up working and paying taxes to subsidize other women’s childbearing? What happens when a dude with superior genetics can start a bidding war on his balls? What happens when a woman has to ask a man – pretty please – can we have a baby?"
*and yes I know it's sarcasm