The Replica Prop Forum

The Replica Prop Forum
Very cool site I am also a member of

Thursday, November 3, 2022

My blog is being shadow banned HARD

According to the stats for my blog, I have gone from an average of 80-200 views a day to less than 20 views a day.  Why?  What happened?  The only thing I can think of is "GOOGLE" decided it didn't like the content I was posting.  Especially as it stopped Adsense from posting ads on ANY of my blogs.  According to the records available to me through Adsense and Blogger, Google started shadow banning me about 3 weeks ago.  At least that is the only thing I can think of when my views dropped off the proverbial cliff from one day to the next.  On day one, I had 93 views, on day two, I had 7 views.  And my posts went from an average of 30-50 views to less than 10 views.  Can you come up with a reason why I am suddenly being shadow banned, and Adsense is no longer serving ads on my blog?

Federal Judge attacks Justice Thomas AND the Bruen Decision… In the dumbest way possible... - Langley Outdoors Academy

Wednesday, November 2, 2022

Society of Professional Journalists Caught Lying About Reason Veritas was EJECTED From MediaFest '22 - Project Veritas

ATF tricks sailor into buying "mUsHeEn GuN" - AR-15.com

France Demands Rumble Censor Russian News Outlets, Rumble Says NO - Timcast IRL

LawDog needs some help with legal fees.



LawDog needs some help. He is being hounded by an over-zealous prosecutor and has been strung along for 2 years. Evidently the prosecutor tried to wait it out hoping LawDog would just accept a plea deal, after running up his legal fees. However he is an honorable person and won't countenance that. So he needs some assistance paying for his increasing legal fees.

His Give Send Go so you can donate to help is: LawDog Legal Defense

There is also a raffle as Old NFO has stated in the video. You can go to his Blog Post here: A new raffle

Please help if you can. DO NOT, please, DO NOT OVER EXTEND YOUR FINANCES. Only give what you can truly afford.

DOJ Caught Pressuring Gun Owners to Give Up 2A Rights ~ VIDEO - Ammoland.com

 USA – -(AmmoLand.com)- Between 2016 and 2019, the FBI served documents to residents of Maine, Michigan, and Massachusetts at their homes in what many are arguing was coercion for them to give up their gun rights.

The document was a form called “NICS Indices Self-Submission Form.” Although the form had “self-submission” in its title and cleverly notes that the signing of the document is “voluntary,” it appears to be essentially a document to encourage residents to relinquish their 2nd Amendment rights. The FBI is being accused of intimidating people into signing it when agents showed up at their front doors.

This so-called “self-submission” form was given to individuals who were being looked at by FBI for things such as alleged violent threats in online chat rooms. By signing the form, people were agreeing to full disclosure of their mental health records to the FBI and a waiver of their rights to privacy under the privacy act of 1974 and HIPPA protections.


Click the link to read the whole article:  DOJ Caught Pressuring Gun Owners

Friday, October 28, 2022

The Bump Stock Case that the ATF Should be Worried About - Washington Gun Law

Roller Bearing Sabot Shotgun Slugs - British Brilliance! - Taofledermaus

It Is illegal To Ship, Transport, Receive, Or Possess Older Rifle Kits - CRS Firearms

Say Goodbye To The 2nd Amendment In Oregon - Copper Jacket TV

Answering Spicy Questions While Eating Super Hot Peppers - Epic Homesteading

NYPost Hacked, Calls for Death of AOC - Liberty Doll

CDC Adds Covid To Childhood Vaccine Schedule, Pfizer Immediately Raises Price - Ben Swann


CDC Adds Covid To Childhood Vaccine Schedule, Pfizer Immediately Raises Price - powered by sovren.media

Democrats BLOWS WHISTLE On Major Vote Fraud Operation, DeSantis Initiates CRIMINAL Investigation - Tim Pool

Thursday, October 27, 2022

Top 10 Creepiest Stories from the St. Louis Region Told by Author Troy Taylor | Living St. Louis - Nine St. Louis

As some of you may know I used to live in St. Louis. I was born there, grew up there, except for all of the summers I spent on a farm in North Central Arkansas up until my teens. But I got married and raised my kids in St. Louis until my father died in 2004 when I moved to Texas with my kids. I have gone on "Ghost Hunts", and despite what you may or may not believe, I experienced some things which I cannot explain. Were they paranormal? I don't know, I just know I can't explain them.

Tuesday, October 11, 2022

Update on New York's "Social Media" Provision - Operation Blazing Sword/Pink Pistols


Logo

Dear Pink Pistol members and Operation Blazing Sword volunteers,

We have received a number of questions, comments and emails that essentially ask the same thing: Wasn't the social media provision of New York's concealed carry laws struck down by a Federal judge last week?

The answer, unfortunately, is "no". Per Document #27 in the case of Antonyuk v. Hochul, aspects of New York's Concealed Carry Improvement Act, including the social media provision, have merely been temporarily restrained from enforcement for two weeks until the judge can hear more detailed arguments from both sides, not struck down. Put in layman's terms, the judge has said "Until this case has been decided in court, these laws are on hold."

Your confusion is entirely understandable as many reputable outlets have been publishing the Associated Press article by Michael Hill wherein the author states that a "Federal judge halts key parts of New York's new gun law" and that "multiple provisions in a state law passed this year are unconstitutional." While these statements are technically correct, they paint a false image by not mentioning that this halt is temporary and the result of a restraining order, leading readers to incorrectly assume that this is a permanent result of a court decision. As always, when it comes to the media reporting on guns, verify from original sources whenever possible.

The state of New York has predictably appealed this ruling, and the appeals court will likely rule on this Temporary Restraining Order in the coming days. Because it is critical that that the courts recognize the grave impact this law has on First Amendment rights, we must act quickly to put this issue before the court.

If you are a New York resident and this law has forced you to self-censor on social media or stop using it altogether, or it has made you change your mind about applying for a concealed carry permit, you have standing to bring suit against New York. Please contact Anna Diakun, Staff Attorney for the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, to become a plaintiff in this case.

Copyright (C) 2022 Operation Blazing Sword. All rights reserved.

Operation Blazing Sword
800 Belle Terre Pkwy Ste 200-302
Palm Coast, FL 32164-2314


Saturday, October 8, 2022

SAF Files Memorandum for Preliminary Injunction - Second Amendment Foundation

SAF FILES MEMORANDUM FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Attorneys for the Second Amendment Foundation's challenge of California's new law that includes a one-way fee-shifting penalty to discourage lawsuits against restrictive gun laws have filed a memorandum of points and authorities in support of their motion for a preliminary injunction.

Attorneys Bradley A. Benbrook and Stephen M. Duvernay of the Benbrook Law Group, PC, and David H. Thompson, Peter A. Patterson and Joseph O. Masterman of Cooper & Kirk, PLLC filed the memorandum, which asserts plaintiffs have already suffered harm due to the constitutional violations contained in the new law.

The lawsuit, and this new memorandum, allege the law (Section 1021.11 of the California Penal Code) is unconstitutional under the Supremacy Clause, and that it also violates the First Amendment right to petition the government for redress of grievances. The statute also discriminates against gun rights plaintiffs in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, according to the lawsuit.

SAF is joined by Gunfighter Tactical, LLC, PWGG, L.P., the San Diego County Gun Owners' PAC, California Gun Rights Foundation, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., Dillon Law Group, P.C., John Phillips, Ryan Peterson, George M. Lee, John W. Dillon and James Miller, for whom the lawsuit is named.

The new motion also says Section 1021.11 has "caused several Plaintiffs to dismiss or refrain from bringing additional lawsuits challenging other California firearms regulations that they believe are unconstitutional."

"We are pulling out all the stops in fighting this new statute because of its egregious nature," said SAF founder and executive vice president Alan M. Gottlieb, one of the plaintiffs in the case known as Miller v. Bonta. "Section 1021.11 is part of Senate Bill 1327, adopted earlier this year in reaction to a Texas law passed last year, which is about abortion. The California law was crafted as a political response to the Texas statute, which California Attorney General Rob Bonta, the chief defendant in our case, described as 'blatantly unconstitutional.'

"Bonta is trying to have it both ways," Gottlieb continued. "He simply cannot protest a law he considers unconstitutional by enforcing another law which is equally unconstitutional in what amounts to a childish political snit that began with California Gov. Gavin Newsom and the California legislature."

Thank you.
Your support makes our work possible.
Here are the companies that help sponsor the Foundation.
Copyright © 2022 Second Amendment Foundation, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email as a supporter of the Second Amendment Foundation. We thank you for all of your support as we continue to fight for your rights.

Our mailing address is:
Second Amendment Foundation
12500 ne 10th pl
bellevue, wa 98005

Thursday, October 6, 2022

Primitive Technology: Smelting Iron In Brick Furnaces - Primitive Technology

The Shotgun Violin Reload - Lucky Gunner Ammo

Misdemeanor Gun Forfeiture Ordinance Reveals Hole in Ohio Preemption Law - Ammoland.com

 U.S.A. – -(Ammoland.com)- “Richmond Heights City Council has passed an ordinance that adds further stipulations to misdemeanors surrounding firearms, including the forfeiture of weapons if convicted,” The News Herald reports. “The law was passed this past week in order to help combat the growing number of firearm violations.”

If they were firearm violations and the city knows about them, then there are already laws on the books making them illegal, for which known violators can be charged and prosecuted. Indeed, that’s the case here, with current misdemeanor charges applicable for illegal discharges, possession while intoxicated, and carrying a gun into an establishment posted as banning them, with the added proviso that doing so without a permit “is a felony.”

What the Richmond Heights ordinance does is require a violator’s gun to be forfeited.

What the city is doing is transparent: It is adding more punishments not included under Ohio law. This is unabashedly an in-your-face gun-grabber retaliation against Ohio’s recently-enacted “permitless carry” law. Think of it as “lawfare.” More appropriately, think of it as an act of “We’ll show you” revenge by spiteful bureaucratic gun-grabbers.

And they dictate the terms of gun owner surrender in no uncertain terms:

“Under this new legislation passed in Richmond Heights, the misdemeanor and fine will remain with the added stipulation that the weapon is forfeited. The forfeiture of these weapons under the new law cannot be contested, and the courts will not have discretion on the matter of the seizure.”

The thing is, Ohio is a preemption state.  But Richmond Heights is counting on a legal workaround, or what could be called the “gun confiscation loophole.”

“The forfeiture laws were revised about 10 years ago and a municipality’s ability to create a forfeiture penalty was expressly reserved by the state to the municipalities,” City Prosecutor Michael E. Cicero claimed. “You could have a forfeiture for the misdemeanor and the state has reserved that for cities and villages.”

Click the link to read the whole article:  Hole in Ohio Preemption Law

Thursday, September 29, 2022

China EXPOSED Running SECRET POLICE In US, Canada, And Europe As Fear Of World War Three Escalates - Tim Pool

FOIA Uncovers ATF and Legacy Media Working Together - Ammoland.com

 SPRINGFIELD, VA -(Ammoland.com)- When the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) told Representative Michael Cloud’s (R-TX) office that it held nearly one billion out of business records, Gun Owners of America (GOA) called it an illegal gun registry. The legacy media newspaper, USA Today, issued a “fact check” stating that the claim was false. Now thanks to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by GOA and Gun Owners Foundation (GOF), we know how much of a role the ATF played in determining the rating.

Last January,  the ATF answered an inquire by Rep Cloud’s office stating that it held nearly one billion records in its Out of Business Office in Martinsburg, West Virginia. The vast majority of the records were digitized, and the ATF’s Firearms Trace Center had access to the documents. Although the ATF claims the records are not searchable by anything other than the former federal firearms licensee (FFL) name, by just selecting a few options in the software, those records could be usable by using optical character recognition (OCR).

A new FOIA request by GOA and GOF shows the communication between the USA Today fact checker, ATF’s former Chief of the Public Affairs Division, April Langwell, and former ATF Associate Deputy Director Thomas Chittum. Mr. Chittum has left the ATF to work for ShotSpotter. Ms. Langwell also recently left the ATF to work as the Director of Communications for the United States Marine Corp (USMC).

In the exchange, the unnamed fact-checker asked about the alleged registry. Ms. Langwell and Mr. Chittum denied the existence of the gun registry. Mr. Chittum replied that there was no firearms registry and handed off the conversation to Ms. Langwell. Ms. Langwell repeated the claim that the database is only searchable by FFL name. She stated that the ATF doesn’t consider the digitally scanned records to be a gun registry. The fact checker did not follow up on how easy it would be to turn on optical character recognition. The fact checker seemed to accept Ms. Langwell’s claims at face value.

Click the link to read the whole article:  ATF and Legacy Media Working Together

Federal Court Strips ATF Power To Regulate And Review Frames/Receivers!!! - Armed Scholar

Tuesday, September 20, 2022

An Attempt To Normalize Myocarditis In Children? - Ben Swann


An Attempt To Normalize Myocarditis In Children? - powered by sovren.media

The New York Presbyterian Hospital recently released a promotional video depicting a young girl with myocarditis. Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle that can lead to cardiac arrhythmia and death. Since 2021, there has been a significant spike in myocarditis cases, particularly in young people. While many mainstream reports have claimed the rise of myocarditis is a result of "long covid," there are a plethora of studies that say the COVID-19 vaccines are the culprit.

According to the NIH, National Institute of Health, myocarditis is, in fact, a side effect of the COVID-19 vaccines and, "may be due to their strong immune response to the vaccine."

The New England Journal of Medicine reported in December of 2021 that, "Reports have suggested an association between the development of myocarditis and the receipt of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), but the frequency and severity of myocarditis after vaccination have not been extensively explored."

The Lancet reported in June of 2022, "many observational studies from Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and North America have found COVID-19 mRNA vaccination to be associated with a short-term increased risk of myocarditis... higher than expected rates of myocarditis (and pericarditis, a closely related clinical presentation), specifically in individuals younger than 35 years."


https://covid19.nih.gov/news-and-stories/covid-19-vaccines-myocarditis

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2110737

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)00842-X/fulltext

Murphy Blocking Cruz School Security Bill Says It All - Ammoland.com

 United States Senate – -(AmmoLand.com)- The next time some anti-Second Amendment extremist claims that those of us who object to gun control aren’t trying to prevent school shootings, the objection of Senator Chris Murphy to Ted Cruz’s School Security Enhancement Act should be thrown in their face.

Second Amendment supporters are all too aware of how anti-Second Amendment extremists weaponize mass shootings in general and mass shootings at schools in particular against our rights. Cruz’s legislation would allow current Student Support and Academic Enrichment grant programs to be used to improve the security at schools.

This sort of thing is – or should be – a no-brainer all around. Who doesn’t want safe schools? Chris Murphy, for one, it seems. What could he find so objectionable about Cruz’s legislation, which doesn’t even permit the use of the grants to arm teachers or train them?

We can quibble whether or not Cruz should have allowed the grants to be used to arm teachers. On the one hand, arming teachers does generate controversy (a voluntary program really shouldn’t, but we’re not in an ideal world). On the other hand, if Murphy won’t even support measures to improve school security that don’t involve guns… what do we have to gain by taking armed teachers off the table? That can be discussed later.

The topic for now, must be Murphy’s decision to object to even bringing such a measure up for debate. This is a no-lose proposition for Second Amendment supporters, especially if we make a lot of noise about it now. If we are seen working on efforts to deter, prevent, or mitigate mass shootings – including efforts that don’t involve guns – we have a chance to head off attacks.

Click the link to read the whole article:  Murphy Blocking Cruz School Security Bill

Rare Ghost Gun Found on Michigan Gun Disposal List, But that is Not All - Ammoland.com

 U.S.A. -(AmmoLand.com)- Michigan law requires police and sheriff departments to turn confiscated firearms over to the state police. The state publishes a list of firearms each month that have not been claimed.

From the michigan.gov website:

The information below identifies firearm(s) confiscated by a Michigan law enforcement agency and turned over to the Michigan State Police (MSP) pursuant to MCL 28.434 and MCL 750.239.

List of Weapons to be Destroyed:

List of weapons to be destroyed October 2022 (public notice date 9-1-2022)(embeded below).  

If you are claiming ownership of any firearm(s) listed, please write or call within thirty (30) days of the date of public notice. In addition to your ownership claim, you must be authorized to possess firearms.

If no valid ownership claim is received by MSP within thirty (30) days of the date of public notice, the firearm(s) listed above will be destroyed.

Firearm(s) listed above are not for sale.

The firearms are listed for 30 days so owners can identify them and apply to have them returned.

If no one claims the firearms, they are destroyed. Michigan law does not require they be destroyed. The destruction of firearms has become a wasteful tradition.

Click the link to read the whole article:  Ghost Gun on Gun Disposal List

Sunday, September 18, 2022

BAND-MAID Documentary / SAIKI - Ohrenje



Are you ready for a new series of documentaries about each members of BAND-MAID ? Kasper Michaels will take you to a memorable journey to learn more about this incredible band. There will be many pieces of  information you might already know but I hope you'll learn here and there.

We start our journey with SAIKI, last member to join BAND-MAID as a lead vocalist.

Former model and huge fan of Namie Amuro, she makes her way to the top with BAND-MAID even though she has a lot of second thought while auditioning for the band.
 
Join us to learn more about Saiki and her life until today.

※ Credits
Voiceover by Kasper Michaels
Script by Kasper Michaels & @Ohrenje
Video production by @Ohrenje
Breakin' New Gate Production logo by santivill

Solo Overnight Building a DIY Debris Cabin in The Woods and Skillet Lasagna - Corporals Corner