"His complaint was NOT that the study was flawed, drew incorrect conclusions, or wasn’t backed by science. No, it was that it undermined the message he and the rest of the Nanny State pseudoscientists want us to believe."
I'm sorry, but FACTS are FACTS. If they are not FACTS they would would be called a HYPOTHESIS. So for some Scientist/Researcher to get all butt hurt because his conclusions were DISPROVED show a remarkable lack of MATURITY. So he is like a little child throwing a tantrum.
And these are the people who EDUCATE our children.
The Replica Prop Forum
Very cool site I am also a member of
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment