More on the NSA and their collection of information

"For more than a year, NSA officials have insisted that although Edward Snowden had access to reports about NSA surveillance, he didn't have access to the actual surveillance intercepts themselves. It turns out they were lying.1 In fact, he provided the Washington Post with a cache of 22,000 intercept reports containing 160,000 individual intercepts. The Post has spent months reviewing these files and estimates that 11 percent of the intercepted accounts belonged to NSA targets and the remaining 89 percent were "incidental" collections from bystanders."

Mike's main site can be NFSW but he has stuff like this.  And it just goes to show just how much of our lives have been dissected by the Government through the NSA.

And it needs to S-T-O-P

Unless I and others have done something illegal, the NSA needs to get an ACTUAL Warrant, not a FUSA warrant to surveil me and mine.

Even Paranoids have enemies

"Someone might be watching you through your laptop's webcam – without even activating the warning light. Reports say the FBI has had this capability for several years, and researchers at John's Hopkins were able to demonstrate how to covertly spy via webcams in MacBooks."

I've been accused of being paranoid.  Those people who called me that pointedly ignore every news story I send them about Edward Snowden's revelations.

They totally ignore every other story I send them about the NSA, FBI, CIA, DEA, and ATF Abuses.

And yet they still call me paranoid.

I call them oblivious and clueless.

Ben Swann - NSA's Crininal Activity

Snowden the great Redaction has begun

Over at Ace's

I think we need to start screen shotting all of the stories and reposting the screen shots.

NSA PRISM Leaker

"THE LEAKER: A 29-year-old high school dropout who worked for consulting giant Booz Allen Hamilton has claimed responsibility for disclosing the programs to The Guardian and The Washington Post."

From that article he sounds like he is an Obama Flavoraid drinker who was disillusioned by his chosen Messiah's actions or lack of action about the surveillance programs against American Citizens.  And he was also disillusioned about how the CIA tried to recruit intelligence assets overseas.

In a different news story he claims "Much of what I saw in Geneva really disillusioned me about how my government functions and what its impact is in the world," he told The Guardian. "I realized that I was part of something that was doing far more harm than good."

So he was working for the .GOV before "The One" came into office and considered disclosing the information then, but didn't since his Messiah won the election.  And when he saw that the problem became worse under his Messiah he decided to go public.

Is that what I'm reading in those two articles?   What do you get from them?